Meghan Markle, the former Hollywood actress turned Duchess of Sussex, has been at odds with her husband Prince Harry’s family for some time now. This familial discord has played out in the media, causing tension and division among the royals.
Meghan Markle’s recent appearance at the Invictus Games alongside Prince Harry was expected to be an opportunity for her to promote unity and family values. However, Tom Bower, a well-respected Royal expert, was quick to point out what he saw as a glaring inconsistency in Meghan’s message.
In her first speech at the event, Meghan highlighted the importance of spending time with family. She mentioned her children, Archie and Lili, who are currently residing in California. Meghan explained her late arrival at the games by stating that she had to give her children milkshakes. But Bower found this explanation implausible and raised some thought-provoking questions.
Tom Bower’s skepticism arose from the timeline of events. The Invictus Games began on Saturday, September 9th, but Meghan left for the event on Monday, September 11th. Bower wondered aloud about who would be handling the school run for the rest of the week if Meghan had to personally deliver milkshakes to her children. He also questioned whether the children were attending school only one day a week.
Another point of contention that Tom Bower brought up was the conspicuous absence of Meghan and Harry’s children, Archie and Lili, from the public eye. While the couple has made efforts to maintain their privacy, Bower suggested that their children’s virtual invisibility raised questions about their existence.
Some even interpreted Bower’s remarks as insinuating that Archie may not be a real person but rather an illusion crafted for the Royal narrative. This notion adds an intriguing layer to the ongoing speculation surrounding Meghan and Harry’s family life.
Intriguingly, despite Meghan and Harry’s return to the UK for the Queen’s celebration, reports indicated that no one had attended Archie’s birthday party at Frogmore Cottage. Even prominent figures like Oprah Winfrey and James Corden, who are known to be close to the couple, had not seen their children during their visits to Montecito.
Tom Bower’s criticism of Meghan Markle wasn’t limited to her handling of the Invictus Games and her family’s visibility. He also pointed out what he saw as hypocrisy in Meghan’s public image. Bower highlighted instances where Meghan appeared to advocate for family values while, in his view, neglecting her own family.
Bower went on to suggest that Meghan’s public appearances, including her speeches, were meticulously planned and calculated. He alleged that her recent mention of her nana’s excursion was a deliberate move designed to garner media attention. Bower argued that Meghan’s every action seemed to be part of a carefully orchestrated PR strategy.
In the eyes of Tom Bower, Meghan’s efforts to transform her public image into that of a relatable, down-to-earth mother who shops at the mall and eats burgers were falling flat. He asserted that, at her core, Meghan remained the divisive figure many perceived her to be. Bower contended that no amount of money or PR could change a person’s true essence.
Ultimately, Meghan and Harry’s desire to live their lives in the public eye while simultaneously seeking privacy seemed incompatible to Bower. He argued that their attempts to intrude on the Royal Family’s schedule or borrow phrases from perceived competitors only served to undermine their credibility and make them appear more out of touch.
In conclusion, Tom Bower’s critique of Meghan Markle’s recent actions and statements has once again thrust the Duchess of Sussex into the spotlight. His pointed questions and observations have added a layer of complexity to the ongoing narrative surrounding Meghan and Harry’s family life. It remains to be seen how these latest developments will impact the public’s perception of the royal couple.